inflearn logo

LLM Evaluation Harness Engineering Explained by a Silicon Valley Developer

If you’ve ever had trouble determining whether the quality of responses declined after changing a prompt or model while building a service using an LLM, this course may be the solution. You’ll learn how to create your own evaluation criteria and automatically identify responses that have changed.

(4.9) 14 reviews

574 learners

Level Basic

Course period Unlimited

JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Business Productivity
Business Productivity
AI
AI
ChatGPT
ChatGPT
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Business Productivity
Business Productivity
AI
AI
ChatGPT
ChatGPT

Reviews from Early Learners

4.9

5.0

Be Dev

91% enrolled

Rather than mastering an evaluation method called Eval, I think the course is more about introducing concepts and validation patterns like these. In other words, I feel it’s very helpful for broadening one’s perspective. I also thought it was quite an innovative topic while taking the course myself.

5.0

seha incheon

83% enrolled

Since there are so many lines of code and files, I felt it was a little difficult to follow along while you were proceeding by simply copying things. Still, the content was so informative and covered a topic I had never heard of before that I think I was able to tolerate those shortcomings. In particular, since the model used for evaluation cannot be trusted either, that model also needs to be evaluated. But if another model evaluates it again, then ultimately it becomes impossible to trust it. Understanding it from that perspective, I think the conclusion of model evaluation is that humans have to put in the hard work. - In fact, I understand that Meta hired more people and used more human labor to give tasks to and train models, and it seems that perspective is reflected here as well.

5.0

시골햄스터

30% enrolled

It's fun.

What you will gain after the course

  • Implement a tool for collecting and quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating LLM responses

  • Verify quality differences before and after prompt and model changes through regression testing

  • How to Design Evaluation Datasets and Clear LLM Evaluation Criteria

  • Building a Reliable Evaluation Pipeline by Combining LLM Judges and Rule-Based Evaluation

  • Trace failed responses to analyze the cause of the problem among the prompt, retrieval, and model.

  • Connect evaluation results to CI/CD to continuously manage the quality of LLM services

Recommended for
these people

Who is this course right for?

  • Developers who operate LLM services and need to validate the impact of prompt and model changes

  • A developer who wants to systematically evaluate the response quality of LLM agents and RAG services

  • AI service developers who find it difficult to begin quality validation due to the lack of evaluation datasets and criteria

  • A developer looking to automate manual testing and introduce regression testing before deployment

  • A developer who wants to complete an LLM evaluation harness as a project that can be applied directly to real-world work.

Hello
This is Hong

Inflearn Verified

Career Verified

13,173

Learners

675

Reviews

183

Answers

4.8

Rating

34

Courses

I started studying development after becoming interested in it while idling around at home, and I am currently responsible for platform server development in Pangyo. I continue sharing my knowledge because I want to provide you with the methods I used to study, as well as various issues you may encounter in practice and their solutions.

 

The courses are not created solely from my own knowledge. Every course is made possible with the help of others.

 

[Knowledge Sharer Experience]

[Former] Blockchain developer specializing in Sandbox IP

[Former] Metaverse backend developer

[Current] A server developer stagnating in Pangyo

 

[Interview History]

[Other Inquiries]

[Official Website and Social Media]

More

Curriculum

All

23 lectures ∙ (5hr 21min)

Course Materials:

Lecture resources
Published: 
Last updated: 

Reviews

All

14 reviews

4.9

14 reviews

  • jongyeans0201님의 프로필 이미지
    jongyeans0201

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    48% enrolled

    While most of the many LLM courses on the market simply focus on writing prompts or using tools, this course offers differentiated content that is hard to find elsewhere: how to control AI’s nondeterministic nature and build it into an automated evaluation pipeline. A solid understanding of embeddings, chunking, vectors, and related concepts is necessary to fully engage with the course at a deeper level, so learners who are particularly curious about these topics will need to pursue additional related study. Even so, this is the only course that covers the harness engineering required to "evaluate LLMs" :)

    • jhong
      Instructor

      Exactly!! These days, LLM courses are simply framed around things like "high-performing prompts" and "boosting productivity through prompts," but I felt that they didn’t address the fundamental topics. \

  • hae1on917님의 프로필 이미지
    hae1on917

    Reviews 13

    ∙

    Average Rating 4.3

    5

    87% enrolled

    A brilliant lecture that organizes intuition-driven LLM quality management using numbers and code While developing LLM services, I was always concerned about how difficult it was to clearly verify whether the quality of responses had genuinely improved or whether something had broken elsewhere whenever I changed a prompt or model. This lecture systematically covers everything from rule-based scoring and LLM-as-a-Judge to bias prevention and building a regression testing pipeline before deployment, going beyond simple API calls. In particular, I was able to gain a solid understanding of the underlying principles by implementing an evaluation harness from the ground up in a local environment, without relying on external paid APIs or heavyweight frameworks. I highly recommend this essential course to engineers who want to deploy and operate LLM features reliably at a production level.

    • jhong
      Instructor

      Hello, Kangpyeong. Thank you for leaving a review. The perspectives of bias and judges may have been unfamiliar to you, but I’m glad to see that you seem to have understood them well. Haha. The evaluation pattern itself, known as “eval,” is also quite unfamiliar at this point. So rather than covering it in too much depth, I approached it from the perspective of introducing these topics and areas of interest for you to explore further. - As a result, I naturally minimized the lecture time as well!! Have a great day today!!

  • gohome님의 프로필 이미지
    gohome

    Reviews 28

    ∙

    Average Rating 4.8

    5

    100% enrolled

    I had been creating and using rubrics to evaluate LLM outputs personally, and this course was helpful because it allowed me to understand my existing approach in a more systematic way. It provided a comprehensive overview of the entire LLM evaluation process—including not only rubrics but also LLM judges, evaluation datasets, and regression testing—all at once. It also helped me determine how to further develop the evaluation methods I had been using in practice. For those who are already using LLMs in their work or have created and are using their own evaluation criteria, I think this course would be very helpful from the perspective of organizing and improving upon their existing approach.

    • jhong
      Instructor

      Thank you for leaving such a great review. As you mentioned, the video was made with the goal of providing an overall look at the patterns commonly used in LLM evaluation from a practical perspective!! The weather has been very cold lately ㅠㅠ Please take care of your health and have a great day!

  • hamzzii님의 프로필 이미지
    hamzzii

    Reviews 11

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    30% enrolled

    It's fun.

    • koelkorea7927님의 프로필 이미지
      koelkorea7927

      Reviews 28

      ∙

      Average Rating 5.0

      Edited

      5

      13% enrolled

      For people in other fields who do not directly develop or research models, I think this is an excellent lecture that provides technically meaningful knowledge and thought-provoking insights exactly where they are needed, like rain after a drought. These days, the nondeterminism of LLM outputs is widely known. However, it is still difficult to find concrete information about how to construct a black box for evaluating the value and accuracy of such outputs, how people should approach it to adjust and change configuration values, and how they should assess the resulting outputs. I think a topic that addresses these aspects so well is quite meaningful at this point in time.

      • jhong
        Instructor

        A welcome relief in a drought… Thank you so much for leaving such a kind comment. What you mentioned about the “black box” really resonates with me. It seems the idea that “AI agents just handle everything well, right?” has run its course, and as a result, we’re seeing a lot more discussion around the question, “Is this safe?”

    Hong's other courses

    Check out other courses by the instructor!

    Similar courses

    Explore other courses in the same field!

    25% off for new members

    $64.70

    25%

    $84.70