I wish the volume was similar to other digital lectures. There were times when I was surprised when I listened to other lectures or music while listening to this. I think there should be a standard for volume... Personally, I think it's better for Inflearn lectures to have the instructor's name written on them.
Even without any knowledge of CS,
you explained threads and processes, and some asynchronous programming concepts very easily and naturally.
I also liked the way you lectured using analogies, focusing on concepts and theories, rather than demonstrating libraries or commands.
Thank you for the great lecture!
I hope you have a great day!
As Python is widely used, the common requirement for programming languages, namely, the demand for performance, naturally increases, and in order to meet that, specifications that gradually move away from the advantage of "Python is easy" are added. This change is a natural change in an active language, but if there is no technical explanation to support that change, it seems difficult to be effective. From that perspective, this lecture is really valuable! ^^
At first, I only wrote functions and used them in Jupyter, but I gradually got tired of the code duplication and the maintenance, so I wandered around, and then I learned about classes, so I applied classes somehow, and then I learned about asyncio, so I listened to the lecture while wandering around trying to use it somehow.
I thought that asyncio was the only answer because it only shows what I know, but after listening to the lecture, I think I can write it while considering blocking, nonblocking, IObound, and CPUbound and mixing them appropriately.
When I study alone, I always wander around without knowing the core and just think, "It's like this," but after listening to the lecture, I learned the core, and now I'm ready to add more flesh to it.
Thank you so much for the lecture.
I'll really code well based on what you taught me. Thank you!!