I have experience struggling to use PySide6 by teaching myself and constantly asking GPT. That’s why I wanted to learn Qt with C++ more systematically, but I am extremely disappointed. Why does most of the lecture content not go beyond simply reading exactly what is written on the PPT? The explanations are either glossed over carelessly or consist of just a few rambling remarks. The lecture is so poor that I have to pause the video and search for the content myself to study. It’s no different from when I was teaching myself. Did you actually put any thought into how to effectively convey this content to the students? Did you prepare and record this properly? I get the strong impression that you didn't, and instead just filmed it haphazardly, relying on the fact that Qt lectures are rare. I cannot believe this is a 3-month limited-access course priced at 110,000 KRW. Even free introductory courses in other fields are not this bad.

I'm retaking this course, and it's great. I'm reviewing the things I learned before but had forgotten. This Qt lecture is good enough to be worth taking again.

Great, I'm retaking it, great.

Too focused on coding.

Advanced features such as QPainter, threads, custom widgets, DB, XML/JSON, networking, and more are systematically covered across the full scope of practical work, which was a great help in building actual applications. The course includes Android app development and installation package creation, making it a well-balanced lecture where you can learn desktop, mobile, and deployment all at once.