Hello MIN and Desire Hamburger,
I originally thought that not responding to opinions that have various meanings is respect for the opinions, so I did not reply, but I will share my thoughts on the review as follows.
As I wrote in the lecture description above, I think the best textbook is the official Kubernetes website, and I still have no change in that opinion.
However, I do not understand why it is called "a waste of time".
Everyone has a different way of learning, and I do not understand why it should be evaluated as a "waste of time".
I think you will know how much that word causes pain to the creator later (though it would be best if you do not). And it is 'people' who directly check reviews with that word and feel emotions. It is not a machine.
Also, I am curious, which **other lectures** (among all lectures provided domestically/overseas) are suitable for a complete beginner? If there is something I can learn from there, I will accept and modify it. No matter how much I think about it, I don't know which domestic/international lecture you are referring to.
My intention is that there are some people who find it difficult to start with the official Kubernetes website, so this is still a reference book. If MIN was a better person to start with the official website, then that is because MIN is very excellent and doing a good job, but I don't know if that is something that the current lecture should be criticized for. When you first took the lecture, you must have listened to it to fill in something that was lacking, but if you listened to it because [1-3] was lacking in the above overall review, I understand, but I would like to ask about your thoughts on [4].
As expected, as a Java Spring developer, you may have said that it was very difficult at first because of overlapping terms, but if you look at the official Kubernetes website, there are a lot of overlapping terms. This is something that happened while absorbing the open source characteristics and existing platforms, and there is something that cannot be helped.
Anyway, what I want to ask is
What kind of lecture is the perfect beginner's course that is not a "waste of time"?
If "Official website"? Then the official Kubernetes website is a textbook and reference book, and if the official website is sufficient, there is no need to take the course... I don't know what you mean.
The official Kubernetes website is one of the best-maintained documents among open sources, and there can be no course that covers "more content" than the official website. I still think that if the official website is sufficient, there is no need for a separate course. I never wrote that this is a priority over the official website... Why did you write "waste of time" here?
If "Other course"? Then I'm really curious. What kind of course are you talking about when you are a complete beginner? I want to know what I am lacking.
I don't really understand the 3 points.
There are no 3-point courses on Inflearn.
3 points means that the course itself is completely meaningless and is only provided as a "waste of time". If we were to give it a grade, 3 points would be a C. (Actually, it's worse than that. I guess you didn't think about the grading system...)
Did you think about it that much?
I don't want to arbitrarily impose my thoughts, but I sincerely
want to hear @MIN's thoughts and opinions.
@All Since it's Chuseok, I'll send you an email later, but I think I'll have to listen to all the feedback and think about whether to stop or continue updating the lecture. I've been having a hard time lately because of the reviews.