･
Reviews 6
･
Average rating 4.7
:: Pros 1. A good lecture to get used to Kubernetes while doing hands-on practice 2. Active answers make it easy to solve problems when errors occur 3. Additional lectures are added to cover Kubernetes in more detail 4. It is good to teach the skills needed to handle Kubernetes from a practical perspective 5. It is suitable for studying by focusing on the flow of Kubernetes by preparing all the complicated parts 6. There is a lecture that organizes some confusing terms to reduce the difficulty of students as much as possible :: Cons 1. The level of explanation is not accurate or clear and ends at a general level (It is said to be intermediate or higher, but even for intermediate level people, the explanation is general ※That does not mean it is insincere) It is better to read the official doc to understand properly (If you explain at a level of a general introduction and proceed with the practice right away, you will end one class) 2. There are some parts that use ambiguous expressions or do not understand exactly and speak in a way that makes you understand ambiguously (This part It is covered by revisions in the supplementary lectures later, but it is difficult for students) 3. A lecture that you will regret if you listen to it expecting detailed explanations from other lecture reviews :: Personal overall review 1. Very good for learning the flow of Kubernetes and the way it is handled from a practical perspective 2. Good for getting used to entering and setting Kubernetes commands 3. It seems good for people who have a certain level of understanding of Kubernetes as it provides various supplementary lectures and the know-how of the instructor 4. If you are completely new to Kubernetes, this lecture is likely to be a waste of time. Based on the results of the lectures before this lecture, it is definitely helpful to watch and listen to the lectures before this lecture, but it is not dramatically helpful. It is suitable for those who need practical experience after watching the official Kubernetes homepage doc or other lectures.
4th match
Hello MIN and Desire Hamburger, I originally thought that not responding to opinions that have various meanings is respect for the opinions, so I did not reply, but I will share my thoughts on the review as follows. As I wrote in the lecture description above, I think the best textbook is the official Kubernetes website, and I still have no change in that opinion. However, I do not understand why it is called "a waste of time". Everyone has a different way of learning, and I do not understand why it should be evaluated as a "waste of time". I think you will know how much that word causes pain to the creator later (though it would be best if you do not). And it is 'people' who directly check reviews with that word and feel emotions. It is not a machine. Also, I am curious, which **other lectures** (among all lectures provided domestically/overseas) are suitable for a complete beginner? If there is something I can learn from there, I will accept and modify it. No matter how much I think about it, I don't know which domestic/international lecture you are referring to. My intention is that there are some people who find it difficult to start with the official Kubernetes website, so this is still a reference book. If MIN was a better person to start with the official website, then that is because MIN is very excellent and doing a good job, but I don't know if that is something that the current lecture should be criticized for. When you first took the lecture, you must have listened to it to fill in something that was lacking, but if you listened to it because [1-3] was lacking in the above overall review, I understand, but I would like to ask about your thoughts on [4]. As expected, as a Java Spring developer, you may have said that it was very difficult at first because of overlapping terms, but if you look at the official Kubernetes website, there are a lot of overlapping terms. This is something that happened while absorbing the open source characteristics and existing platforms, and there is something that cannot be helped. Anyway, what I want to ask is What kind of lecture is the perfect beginner's course that is not a "waste of time"? If "Official website"? Then the official Kubernetes website is a textbook and reference book, and if the official website is sufficient, there is no need to take the course... I don't know what you mean. The official Kubernetes website is one of the best-maintained documents among open sources, and there can be no course that covers "more content" than the official website. I still think that if the official website is sufficient, there is no need for a separate course. I never wrote that this is a priority over the official website... Why did you write "waste of time" here? If "Other course"? Then I'm really curious. What kind of course are you talking about when you are a complete beginner? I want to know what I am lacking. I don't really understand the 3 points. There are no 3-point courses on Inflearn. 3 points means that the course itself is completely meaningless and is only provided as a "waste of time". If we were to give it a grade, 3 points would be a C. (Actually, it's worse than that. I guess you didn't think about the grading system...) Did you think about it that much? I don't want to arbitrarily impose my thoughts, but I sincerely want to hear @MIN's thoughts and opinions. @All Since it's Chuseok, I'll send you an email later, but I think I'll have to listen to all the feedback and think about whether to stop or continue updating the lecture. I've been having a hard time lately because of the reviews.
I wonder if it would be okay if I reported at least 70~80%... Is it right to give a 3 point course evaluation based on 18%?
