Properly Selling HTML CSS - by Yalco

I was listening to Johns Hopkins HTML/CSS/JS lectures on Coursera and I fell for it. Even though Johns Hopkins is a prestigious university, the lectures were poor. However, this lecture was different. 1. First, when evaluating a lecture, I look at the total time of the content. I don't look at lectures that are short because I don't dig deep. However, this lecture was 12 hours long, and it was quite long because it only covered HTML/CSS, so I believed it. The lecturer also proceeded quickly, so it was practically 30 hours compressed. 2. Second, the lecturer's ability to convey the content. I felt that this lecture conveyed the content in a very efficient and clean way. I also liked the flow of the lecture. And it covered not only the core parts, but also the parts that were good to know. It seemed like a lot of effort was put into making it easy to understand. 3. Third, I liked the coding environment setting method that can only be heard here, various tips, and how to study further on your own. After taking only famous but poorly written lectures on Coursera and Udemy, it was nice to finally see a lecture with substance. It made me realize that there is no clear correlation between fame and teaching ability.

It was good that you taught me in detail and went through everything. As with all studies, I found my own way to study and I was able to concentrate much better. In my case, I interpreted the source code myself first and then listened to the lecture. In this case, I thought about whether my interpretation was correct or what the grammar I didn't know meant and went into the lecture, so it stayed in my head longer!

As a YouTube subscriber, I completed the Git lecture and purchased the HTML/CSS lecture. The strength of Yalko's lecture is that the curriculum is clean and the delivery is good, so the content is easy to understand. Although I am listening to the lecture, I am absorbed in it as if I am listening to a story. If you follow the lecture like this, you will see yourself understanding and acquiring the content at some point. I think it is a lecture that is worth the money. If you are thinking about it, I strongly recommend purchasing it.

I only did backend, but there were so many parts that I was stuck on when designing the front end, so I bought it and listened to it. When I first watched the lecture, I was working on the design in a state of vague understanding, but then I suddenly thought, "I heard something in the lecture, but I don't know exactly what I'm using?" Every time I went back and listened to it again, I was able to understand and use it clearly again, unlike when I first listened to it. If there was more in-depth content, I would pay to listen to it. (23-02-23) When something doesn't work while developing, I find the problem and put in the command I want, and it's so fun to see it change exactly. / This may be TMI, but when I first listened to the lecture, I thought the speed was too fast, and I thought I would understand it but not learn anything while watching the instructions on the homepage, but it really shows its value when I read it twice. I recommend that others read it once and try designing, and when you read it twice, don't read it thoroughly, but go to the category of parts that don't work and look at them again. It's really... not a real country, but a real country. // When I have some time, I should take a look at GitHub and JavaScript courses.

To conclude, this is a great lecture. I learned a lot, so I think I'll have to review it again. I'm looking forward to the next lectures!

This is a very good lecture. I started studying as a non-major and a complete beginner, and although others say the HTML&CSS part is fun and easy, I was still a complete beginner, so it was difficult. It was a lecture that was a little over 11 hours long, but I finished it in almost 7 weeks. In fact, I switched to another lecture because it was difficult in the middle, and then came back to this lecture. Since it was the first lecture, I thought maybe the level wasn't right for me, but I thought it was just because I didn't understand it well, and compared to other lectures, it was concise, but it contained a lot of information and the explanations were good, so I finished it. Even if you think of the lectures as being divided into 10~20 minutes, if a complete beginner like me just understands it with my head and moves on, I'll have a mental breakdown later on during the final project. I still haven't properly cloned the final project or understood everything, but I think I need to invest more time and review it. In conclusion, I think the overall quality and content of the lecture were the best. Actually, I don't usually leave course reviews, but I think it would be good for other people to see this kind of high-quality lecture, so I'm leaving one. And thank you for answering my individual inquiries. I'll go review it again.

This is a lecture that I can feel was well prepared. I like that it explains things in detail.

This is the first time I've paid for an online lecture, but it was worth it. I'm really grateful for the great lecture, and in addition to the simple lecture, I've also learned a lot from the materials you prepared and your attitude toward work. I'll finish JavaScript too~