While taking your lectures... as I was studying, I realized that since I am currently working as a developer at Kakao, this topic might not have been exactly intended for someone like me. - I don't really have plans to change jobs or look for new employment. However, as someone who has watched most of your lectures, I couldn't resist taking this new one. The way you set the basic framework and the way you answer questions, I suppose? As expected, you always seem to organize your lectures with fresh topics and methods. Another characteristic is that it's a bit "rough around the edges" lol. You proceed in a blunt, unrefined manner, but I think it's very helpful if you focus on the content itself, so it personally fits my style perfectly. I really enjoyed this lecture as well!

Rather than feeling like a lecture that spoon-feeds you every little thing, I think it's a course that helps you set a direction for your thinking by contemplating and explaining fundamental aspects. I believe it's great content that allows you to reflect on your preparation process, which used to just be about mindless memorization.

My name is Choi. It's nice to see those of you who have followed me for a while again, haha. While preparing this new course, I had a lot of internal debate about whether this was the right topic to film. To be honest, I don't think this course is necessarily designed to improve your actual development skills. It is simply a course intended to help you with the interview process and preparing for a job change. Even though I participated in creating it... in my opinion, it is obviously not enough to prepare for an interview by only studying these concepts. You naturally need to study many more topics and perspectives. That’s why I can't say, "This course perfectly guarantees a 99% pass rate!!" It is merely the foundational knowledge for answering and preparing from the perspective that I hold. I believe you must find your own way of thinking and contemplating—derived from this knowledge—in your own words. I consider this content to be about showing you how to approach that process: how to think and how to unpack your answers to questions. Therefore, it’s not simply about thinking, "Oh, I just need to know this concept!!" Instead, the goal is to get you to think, "Ah, I can look at it this way. Then should I try thinking about other topics like this too?" I ask for your interest...!! I hope you have a wonderful day. Thank you~!

I'm Ande, and I prepared this lecture with Hong as a Naver interviewer. In an interview, well... these kinds of questions can be asked, but realistically, there are many more diverse and rich questions. It also varies depending on whether you are an experienced professional or a newcomer. However, regardless of the question, the important part you should focus on is not just being someone who answers the interviewer's question, but how you interpret that question and what values you use to explain your answer. It's okay if your answer to a question is incorrect. However, saying something like, "I knew about this part and wanted to improve it, so I used it this way," feels much more impactful in an interview. Please don't just memorize theories. If you can explain how you interpret the concepts you know and how you applied them, I believe you will become a great developer.

This is a lecture that truly elevates one's perspective. I once used the Strategy Pattern to adhere to OCP instead of using switch-case statements at the application level, and it feels similar to using dimension tables to avoid case-when at the database level. I didn't know there were patterns in SQL as well. I feel like I can grow even further.

Thank you for the lecture.

The more I reflect on it, the more I feel it contains truly great content. I think it would be excellent for those who have a habit of self-directed learning. If you go through the detailed explanations of the major topics and take some time to contemplate them on your own... I believe it is structured with content that is better than any other lecture.

I am not satisfied with the quality of the lecture.

The content was intuitive and easy to follow, and I especially liked how you pointed out the differences from other MSQ services and when it's best to use it at the end.

Overall, the structure isn't bad, but there is a disconnect between the lecture titles and the actual content. While I wish the educational materials and example codes were more polished to help students understand better, I was impressed by your consistent efforts to share knowledge with the students.