The explanations are poor, and the hands-on practice is also lacking. The explanations for the English sentences aren't very good either.

The concepts and usage were explained so clearly that I could understand them well. I think I'll need to keep using it to find the methods that work best for me.

The concepts are being organized well.

Several instructors give lectures, and to be honest, some make things very easy to understand while others only make sense halfway. I think that's because their teaching styles are different. So, my solution is to take the lecture materials from the instructors I don't understand, update them using an LLM, and input the parts I didn't grasp as prompts. Asking it to explain with visualizations seems to be very helpful.

I heard you loud and clear.

I learned a lot.

I learned a lot.

It was a bit disappointing as the content focused mainly on simple functional descriptions. I didn't really feel the instructor's unique expertise or insights. While the low price is a plus, considering that the reason for purchasing a paid course is to save time, it was difficult to perceive a clear difference in quality compared to YouTube.

Hello. I remember that the things you said during your seminar in Korea a while ago were very helpful. Recently, I went through the official Claude Code documentation and even took a lecture as a review, and it was very helpful once again. Above all, what you said in the last session really stuck with me. Thank you as always.

These days, everyone says, "Why Python now?" but in the end, it always comes back to Python. Since I'm not in the development field, it hasn't been easy to find the time, and I had only been vaguely thinking about closing my eyes and just powering through the basics from start to finish. This is so useful because it contains exactly the parts I needed. Thank you for the great lecture.