Dear knowledge sharer, I felt I needed to say something, so I am writing this course review.
I own quite a few of Hong's courses. The courses you always created aligned with my needs at the time, so I kept trusting and enrolling in them, but from now on, I do not intend to purchase any more courses from you.
You have three major issues, and these are problems that students have consistently raised, yet I have never seen the feedback properly reflected.
1. You do not share proper information on the course detail pages.
This doesn't mean the course descriptions are sloppy. However, you do not provide accurate course explanations. For example, (apologies for mentioning other courses) in the case of the Kotlin Master Class course, you recommend it to 'those new to Kotlin' and state the difficulty is beginner level, but the explanation of Kotlin grammar is almost entirely omitted. Even if self-study ability is important for developers, shouldn't a course aimed at beginners still provide content that aligns with the stated course goals and description?
The same applies to this course. Do you believe you sufficiently explained 'why Redis is primarily used, knowledge of its architectural components and replication, and how to establish and design caching strategies in high TPS situations' in 1 hour and 53 minutes?
I can already anticipate how you will respond to this.
Anticipating that answer, I would like to discuss the second issue.
2. I hope you would reconsider your recurring response, 'I want to provide courses where students learn by thinking and implementing themselves.' Despite being a 'theory' course, are you aware that the course materials are extremely insincere and static? With just one introduction page, one summary page, and an average of only two pages per chapter, to claim you 'created courses where students learn by thinking and implementing themselves' makes me truly wonder if this statement is for the students' benefit, or if it prioritizes the instructor's situation of not having time to create course materials, or simply being bothered by it. I hope you reflect on this.
Additionally, while self-study is important, the courses you provide are, in practice, not that high-level... Students purchase courses of this level by paying money to absorb your understanding and know-how, thereby saving time, so I don't understand why it's constantly being gaslighted as a lack of self-study willingness on the student's part.
3. Finally, please don't rush to release new courses, and quickly improve parts that were incorrectly explained in existing ones!! Perhaps because you mostly explain things verbally for an entire chapter using only one slide of material, you don't seem to pay much attention to it, but I mentioned an incorrect explanation regarding patterns, and there has been no follow-up action yet.
I frequently visit Hong's community, and it seems there have been quite a few such instances, but I'm unsure if they are being properly addressed. New courses are produced quickly, but existing course improvements also need to be prioritized as if you were creating new courses.
I try not to leave negative feedback, but considering the significant amount of money I paid trusting Hong and the time I invested to take the courses, I am frankly very upset and disappointed. I believe you are an excellent developer, but perhaps not an excellent instructor.
There are parts expressed perhaps too frankly, but I sincerely hope this feedback is well-received and helps in Hong's course creation.