It feels more like an SSOT lecture rather than Harness Engineering... While it's not technically wrong if you view Harness in a narrow sense... Even calling it an SSOT lecture feels like it's lacking in various elements. It seems more suitable as a fragmentary case study presentation at a conference; it doesn't feel like a lecture intended to actually transfer knowledge to someone. To be honest, the screen is so small I can't even see it. Regarding the individual .md files provided as lecture materials: The core is ssot.md. While multi-level control is an advantage, it consumes costs inefficiently due to increased context (token) usage. Although it claims to maintain the existing structure through SSOT after the MVP, it causes excessive technical debt, making future refactoring difficult. Rather than showing the "forest" of Harness Engineering that connects SSOT + SDD + TDD, it delivers only a single branch of a single tree. It seems to have more disadvantages than advantages, such as creating excessive documentation or causing confusion by jumping back and forth, making it easy to make mistakes. Furthermore, it feels like a lecture calling itself Harness Engineering through extremely unfriendly, fragmentary examples without any explanation of ticket units like Sprinter, Epic, Story, or Task (though if one already knew these concepts, there would be no reason to take this lecture).

It was very helpful that you focused on hands-on practice by showing us how you do it yourself, and sharing the docs file was a huge help. Thank you!