While working on the project, there were many infrastructure-related terms that seemed familiar yet strange, but now I feel like I finally understand them correctly! Thank you.

Great! I was assigned as an in-house infrastructure manager, and this was very helpful.

This is a basic networking course! It covers concepts at a surface level, so I don't particularly recommend it for those with a major in the field.

This was a beneficial lecture as I was able to understand the overall basics of IT infrastructure and also understand and confirm the content needed for additional learning in the future. Beyond this, I also look forward to more detailed and in-depth infrastructure lecture content that goes a step further!! Thank you!!

The instructor explains things really easily, but the person who makes videos for a living also summarizes things at our level and asks questions that help refresh parts that could otherwise be boring. The synergy between the two of you is really great, so I can listen to the lectures comfortably like a podcast. The best!

I got a job in IT infrastructure, and this was really helpful for the basics.

It feels too much like a non-expert giving lectures. Rather than acquiring professional knowledge, the teaching is too superficial. The content is weaker than the IT infrastructure lectures from Naver Cloud on YouTube. I thought learning together with students would compensate for the instructor's insufficient explanations, but it feels like taking a class with a friend who doesn't know IT. Since they're non-IT people, there are no sharp questions and it just feels like only talking about costs. The most frustrating part is questioning why "developer" is in the course title. For aspiring developers, the essential knowledge they should know and useful knowledge to have are learned very superficially, so it seems more like "a course for non-majors to quickly understand IT." To summarize: The course depth is too shallow and unprofessional. -> A few Naver Cloud YouTube videos and Red Hat technical documents are more professional, or it would be better to search for information on each lecture topic individually. The unique class structure only extends lecture time -> Although they said non-major students, it would have been better to bring IT industry job seekers rather than people with personal connections.

Your statement that blade servers are similar in size to rackmount servers (blade servers are typically similar to 10U in size), your description of dynamic content as 'moving content' (dynamic content refers to content that varies based on user requests and requires computation), your assertion that forward proxies are located behind web servers (forward proxies are located immediately behind the client for security purposes, such as hiding client information or filtering. Of course, they also perform caching. To fulfill this role, they must be located directly behind the client), and so on—there is too much incorrect information.

It was an informative lecture.

Explaining the basics in detail was very helpful.