It was really great to be able to experience various projects. The course was designed to help me learn problem-solving skills through projects, so I felt like I was growing as I listened to the lectures. I learned a lot and gained confidence, and I will try my best until the end of the course! Thank you for creating such a great course.

I really like studying vanilla js. It's not just about studying grammar, but it's good because it has actual figma design and requirement specifications, and while studying html css markup, it helped me a lot to learn how to structure and frame in react or react native.

The lectures are organized by difficulty level and project, so it is good for practicing projects of the difficulty level I want. I think I will be able to do several projects just by listening to all the lectures.

It's such a shame that this is such an expensive lecture in the 300,000 won range. The overall feeling is that the lecturer just turns on a double monitor, puts the code on one side, and teaches while following along. And he spends a lot of time turning on a CSS file, adding styles one by one to the CSS, and changing the screen to show figma, so if you miss the flow even a little, you can't see what he's doing. And when you look at the final result, the lecturer made a typo and the result didn't show up. 1. Rather than constantly switching back and forth between screens, it would be better to have the code/results on the left and right sides of the screen and keep it fixed. 2. After creating the HTML structure, it would be good to put styles inline right there so that you can intuitively see the results, and once the styles are complete, move all the styles you've put in to the CSS file so that you can see the overall flow, but this doesn't show the HTML code and constantly switches back and forth between the CSS -> Figma screen, putting one line in the CSS file, looking at Figma, putting one line in the CSS, looking at Figma, and so on, so I didn't get it. How should I explain this... To use an analogy, I bought a course called 'Dressing a Fashion Model (HTML) with Clothes (CSS)', but when I open the lid, I often don't see the form of the fashion model (HTML) and only focus on the clothes (CSS) that the person is wearing...? When I come to my senses, the model is already wearing clothes, but the camera only quickly passes by the process of making clothes and occasionally shows the model, so it's hard to see how the model is wearing the clothes. In other words, the process of putting clothes called CSS on top of the existing HTML structure is not visible, but only the process of completing clothes called CSS is visible, so I can't see the flow of whether this person is making pants or arms... I can't explain this in words. I wonder if it would be better to have all three of these on the screen: HTML, CSS, and Figma (or the result window) and mark them as comments above the HTML class that is currently being worked on with CSS... There are just too many screen transitions. In less than 10 seconds, figma -> insert a line in css -> shows html for 1 second, then -> goes back to figma -> goes back to css, inserts a line -> shows the result window again. (Or just keep going back and forth between css -> figma and only moving the css code...) And the instructor goes like this, 'If you put this in, that will appear~ If you put that in, this will appear~', and when you come to your senses, something has been created and the big picture is not well drawn. Considering the price of 300,000 won, it is quite disappointing. If it was 30,000 won, I would have given it 5 stars... If I had to pick something else... The project doesn't run right away after receiving it. Something like having to turn on the backend or some additional process is needed, but when you just turn it on, it turns white and some parts don't come out, which was inconvenient.

I am leaving a review after taking sections 1 and 2. 1. Voice First of all, the part that I was most satisfied with was the instructor's voice. Since the face is not shown in online lectures, I think the voice is an important factor in determining the quality of the lecture. I was able to stay focused throughout the lecture because the instructor explained clearly and step by step. 2. You can selectively take the parts you want You provide images and requirements specifications, so you can create them yourself and then take the lecture. The lectures are divided by function, so you can selectively take the parts you want. 3. Use of Figma I know that using Figma is popular these days. Although I have not created a design with Figma, I was able to figure out how to use and develop it when I received the design with Figma. Above all, it was really convenient because I could easily find out the margins, width, and height. I am leaving a recommendation because I think it would be good for those preparing a portfolio.

I don't recommend this to people who think they have some coding skills. Light examples that are around 3 stars are okay. They're not that difficult. However, the lectures that are given 5 stars are not so good. The coding test is about implementing given conditions and functions, but in the lecture, there are a lot of explanations like "This is a class that does this and that. You'll use it later, so skip it even if you don't understand it." This isn't a lecture. You just watch them code and follow along. When taking the test, shouldn't they explain things in a way that suits the requirements while going through the process and thinking about what they need? That's natural even when doing small toy projects that aren't coding tests. In my opinion, it feels like they just put the completed code next to it and have you follow along while explaining it.

Thank you for the great lecture.

I was a bit worried because of the price range, but I think it's okay! The explanation was easy to understand and easy to understand.

I'm so happy that I can quench my thirst for a portfolio! In particular, the super simple 3D carousel was amazing, and I had fun working on things like making a music player, which is a rare feature :) I'm also touched that there are original design files that I can look at myself ㅠㅠㅠㅠ Thanks to that, I think I was able to work on it as if it were real ㅋㅋㅋ I love the people who made it ㅠㅠㅠㅠ

I didn't see any coding tests, but I bought it because I wanted to practice making web pages, and it seems pretty good. Thank you.