inflearn logo

[Side Projects After Work] Big Data Analysis Engineer Practical Exam (Task Types 1, 2, and 3)

We’ll guide non-majors and beginners to quickly earn the Big Data Analysis Engineer practical certification! Keep the theory light and the practical training solid. Even without complex background knowledge, you’ll focus on past exam questions and study only the key points that are sure to appear on the test.

(4.9) 932 reviews

6,075 learners

Level Beginner

Course period 12 months

Engineer Big Data Analysis
Engineer Big Data Analysis
Big Data
Big Data
Python
Python
Pandas
Pandas
Machine Learning(ML)
Machine Learning(ML)
Engineer Big Data Analysis
Engineer Big Data Analysis
Big Data
Big Data
Python
Python
Pandas
Pandas
Machine Learning(ML)
Machine Learning(ML)

Reviews from Early Learners

4.9

5.0

jocharlie

87% enrolled

Passed the 10th practical with 90 points after DdanJit After Work's lecture! Among all 빅분기 online courses I've taken, DdanJit After Work's was the only one that truly taught practical exam strategies 😊😊 Thanks to this, I learned a lot and completed the practical. Looking forward to more great lectures~~

5.0

milk502

100% enrolled

I'm truly grateful that I started '퇴근후딴짓님's' lecture and was able to pass with a high score in one go..! I think I was able to pass by repeatedly listening to the lectures and following along to solve the practical problems! If you study diligently with '퇴딴짓,' passing is no problem. Thank you so much!

5.0

SH

100% enrolled

This is exactly the course that working professionals need. The lectures aren't burdensome or too long, and they focus only on the essential core content, so you can grasp all the key points just by listening to the lectures. On top of that, I solved the Kaggle playground problems that are additionally provided and did repetitive learning. Thanks to the instructor, I passed this round with a perfect score of 100!! It feels rewarding to have studied so worthwhile!!!

What you will gain after the course

  • Big Data Analysis Engineer Practical Exam Tips: Hands-On Know-How for Passing Directly Through Past Exam Questions

  • Python Basics: Practice right away with only the code that is sure to appear on the exam

  • Pandas Basics: Hands-On Practice Focused on the Essential Features for Working with Data

  • Machine Learning & Statistics Basics: Build and Run Models Right Away Without Complicated Explanations

  • Mastery of Past Exam Question Types: A format designed to help you learn by directly solving every type of past exam question through practice.

[Notice] A challenge (study group) is held for every exam. Recruitment is underway for the 13th challenge.

9c403f8f-859c-4777-afbd-c59f401a7360

These people passed!

💼 Working Professional Success Story

  • A working professional scored 90 points using only their commuting time

  • Scored 90 points after studying for a week after work

  • Scored 85 points while working in the field

🔰 Non-Major Success Stories

  • I didn't know the first thing about Python, but I scored 100 after just three weeks

  • I didn’t know anything about coding and couldn’t even write an if statement, but I scored 90 points

  • 95 points on the first exam as a non-major

⚡ Passed in an extremely short time

  • A perfect score after 5 days of cramming

  • Passed after watching the course at 3x speed for 4 days

  • Started two weeks before the exam and passed

🔄 Successfully passed on the second attempt

  • Passed after failing eight times with Ddanjit's course

  • Passed after retaking the exam


  • Passed after taking Ddanjit’s lectures& consistent, repeated practice

Even if you can self-study for the written exam,
the practical exam is different

The practical exam has its limits if you rely solely on memorization or understanding concepts. Since you must process and analyze the given data and derive results within a limited time, you need to learn a problem-solving approach suited to the actual exam and the flow of writing code.

Why did 4,000 people choose it?

For those short on time, such as working professionals and job seekers, and for non-majors who feel overwhelmed about how to study,
we provide an enjoyable learning experience in a short amount of time—one that leads to passing.

The optimal roadmap to passing

We show you the path to passing with just 1 hour a day and four weeks to completion.

Proven by a variety of reviews

Q&A

Q. Is it really possible even if I don't know how to code?

It is possible! There are multiple real cases of people who knew nothing about Python but passed the exam in just 3 to 6 weeks. You only need to know the minimum amount of coding required for the exam.

Q. I’m a working professional, so I don’t have enough time.

Make the most of your commute! "There is a case of an office worker with lots of overtime who passed with a score of 90 using only their commute time." With an average lecture length of 15–20 minutes, you can make use of spare moments.

Q. I’ve already taken another course. Do I need to take this one too?

Direction is key! As in the case of someone who “passed after failing by studying with Ddanjit’s course,” the right learning direction is the most important. Prepare thoroughly with an exam-focused curriculum.

Q. I’m not good at math or statistics. Will that be okay?

You don't need complicated theory! We explain only the key concepts tested on the exam in an easy-to-understand way. It is structured so that “even non-majors can easily understand it.”

Q. How many times should I take the course?

It varies from person to person, but for beginners starting from scratch, an average of two complete reviews is enough to pass with flying colors! There are even cases of people who {{?}}

Q. Is the latest exam trend reflected?

No need to worry even if the exam trends change! We quickly reflect the latest exam trends in the curriculum. You can study with the "latest version" no matter when you start.

Q. I’m not very familiar with mathematics or statistics. Is that okay? Is the book essential?

For a systematic review, we recommend using the book alongside the course.! However, it is not essential, and this course is not intended to supplement the book, so the content flow may differ from that of the book.

Recommended for
these people

Who is this course right for?

  • Those who don’t want to put off the Big Data Analysis Engineer practical exam any longer

  • Those who want to earn a certification in a short period of time

  • For those who feel overwhelmed about where and how to start with Python, pandas, machine learning, and statistics.

  • For those who dislike studying complex theories and want to quickly finish by focusing only on the key points.

Hello
This is roadmap

Inflearn Verified

Career Verified

7,819

Learners

1,323

Reviews

4,020

Answers

4.9

Rating

11

Courses

More

Curriculum

All

118 lectures ∙ (26hr 58min)

Course Materials:

Lecture resources
Published: 
Last updated: 

Reviews

All

932 reviews

4.9

932 reviews

  • appleskim5694님의 프로필 이미지
    appleskim5694

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    100% enrolled

    I finished the course a week before the exam! I wrote the code myself and compared it with the lectures as instructed by the instructor. It was a great learning method! I think it was a good idea to take the course because the instructor answered my questions quickly and in detail! I will adapt by reviewing the lectures and solving Kaggle problems for the next week! If you are thinking about taking the course, I highly recommend it!

    • roadmap
      Instructor

      Thank you for recommending it as a good study method!! I feel like I've grown a lot when I look at Taebum's questions!! I hope you organize the remaining period well and achieve good results.

    • Teacher, I passed with a stable score!! Thank you for everything😄

  • thstmddns님의 프로필 이미지
    thstmddns

    Reviews 12

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    75% enrolled

    Hello, teacher? I am finally leaving a review. After passing the 7th practical exam with great enthusiasm, I challenged the 8th exam and passed. For the 7th practical exam, I bought a textbook and studied by memorizing all the codes in the textbook. However, on the day of the exam, the codes in my head were all jumbled up and I couldn't use them properly, so I suffered a bitter defeat. When preparing for the 8th re-examination, I took the teacher's lecture. I took the lecture at 3x speed for 4 days. And I studied by solving the materials provided and comparing the source codes every time I took the lecture. Using the tips the teacher gave me during class, I was able to solve the problem in 1 hour on the test day and got 90 points. (I was the first to leave the test room I was in haha) What was helpful about the teacher's lecture was that 1. Consistent writing method can be applied - My previous study method was to memorize the codes in the textbook and blog, so I had to memorize numerous codes for the problem, but through the teacher's lecture, I was able to prepare as a single process to prepare for any problem. 2. Data provision - The data provided are blank spaces and source code colab files. After attending each lecture, I was able to quickly get a feel for it by writing code directly in the blank space file, executing it, and comparing it with the source code file. 3. Task 3 - With the tips given in Task 3, I was able to memorize 3 lines of code and get 20/30 points. 4. Email - The information about the exam that you sent me via email a week before the exam was very helpful (especially the mind map). Thanks to you, I was able to obtain the engineer's license and also develop my skills in AI development, which I am currently working on. Thank you!!!

    • roadmap
      Instructor

      Congratulations on passing :) You watched the lecture at 3x speed and left the room first~~ You seem to be a talented person!! Thank you so much for pointing out the helpful parts and explaining them!! Since you're going into AI, I think I'll see you again at another gathering someday! You worked hard. 💪💪💪

  • wonbin08135415님의 프로필 이미지
    wonbin08135415

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    100% enrolled

    Hello. I passed the practical exam in "Non-major + First Exam". I was lucky to pass the written exam because it was mostly about memorization, but when I actually tried to prepare for the practical exam, I was at a loss. I thought that self-study would not work, so while looking for a lecture, I happened to come across Mr. After Work's lecture on YouTube, and I took the lecture through Infraon. What helped me while studying were: 1. Easy explanations that even someone like me who had never touched Python could understand 2. Curriculum structure just for the Big Data Analysis Engineer practical exam (the best) 3. Review using blank notes, Kaggle, etc. 4. Quick feedback on questions Etc. I studied while working, but just listening to the lecture and reviewing was a great help and not difficult. In the actual practical exam, I couldn't solve the 3rd type 2 question that I had never thought about at all, so I turned it in blank (15 points deducted), but I got everything else right and passed with a score of 85 (final result). I am so grateful that I was able to pass the exam and learn the charm of Python through Mr. Afterwork's lecture. Now, I want to continue learning not just by passing the exam, but to acquire more functions of Python that I don't know about and to utilize them more. I hope that it will be helpful to those who are considering taking the course, so I am leaving a review. I sincerely thank you for creating such a great lecture!!

    • roadmap
      Instructor

      I am so touched that you summarized 4 helpful parts. I think it must be the result of studying hard while working hard 😍 I sincerely congratulate you on passing the exam, and there are so many things you can do with Python, so I recommend you take on another challenge before you forget it!! You worked hard 👏👏👏

  • donedone님의 프로필 이미지
    donedone

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    100% enrolled

    Wow.. When I was studying on my own for the first time in the Big Quarter practical exam, there were a lot of things I didn't understand, so I ended up failing. Then I found out about the After-Work Others lecture, so I took it. I didn't have much time because I was studying while working, but I was able to pass on the second try thanks to the recommended coding and various tips! Data analysis is a difficult field, but if you only take the exam, there's no lecture better than this one. Thanks to you, I passed smoothly with a score of 90, so I'm so happy! I'll have to study data more in the future, using Kaggle, etc.

    • roadmap
      Instructor

      90 points! Wow!! Congratulations on passing with a high score. You listened to the lectures on content you didn't understand and improved your skills to this extent!!! You're talented :) 👏👏👏

  • abcd581262671님의 프로필 이미지
    abcd581262671

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 2.0

    Edited

    2

    31% enrolled

    I'm currently enrolled in a data-related major and completed a 4-month AI bootcamp. I've never learned machine learning at school, and since I relied on GPT during the bootcamp, I consider myself a 'novice who's only heard a lot' and purchased this course for certification. I haven't finished the entire course yet and am writing this midway through, so I'm not sure how my opinion might change. This isn't to say the materials or lectures are terrible. It's just that there are many areas that seem lacking to me. If you don't mind the usual speaking style or pace, aren't sensitive to details, understand quickly, or can review well on your own, this probably won't matter. Overall review == You don't seem to explain things well. The reviews seem much better compared to the actual teaching quality. I am sensitive to sound, but am I the only one who feels this way? Whether you're uploading at 1.1x speed, speaking too fast, or have poor pronunciation, you trail off at the end of sentences and then suddenly speed up when moving to the next point, which is very uncomfortable. You seem to explain things hastily. Your speaking pace varies dramatically between fast and slow. Are you editing out silent pauses? The more I listen to the lectures, the more breathless and suffocated I feel. Like a radio advertisement, the explanations continue without any breathing space. At 1x speed, many parts fly by too quickly to understand, but at 0.9x speed, there are uncomfortable issues like parts becoming too slow or audio distortion, making it too frustrating to listen. Even with content I've written about before, listening to the lecture makes it harder to organize in my head, and the lecture content just passes through my ears. Even when I try to focus and listen properly, the pace is inconsistent, there's too much information, and it feels like you're just reciting what you know rather than explaining for my benefit. It seems like you're recording in real-time rather than practicing and then filming. I wish you would prepare systematically and explain accordingly. As everyone can see from the machine learning block videos on the desk, there are too many unnecessary comments like 'let me move this, let me bring this back, let me do this like this' that aren't related to the lesson. These seem like things you don't need to say, but you mention every single one. This distracts attention and breaks the flow of content, completely breaking concentration. Same with other Colab videos. Using hands-on demonstrations instead of PPT actually seems to have lowered the quality. From someone who already knows the content, it felt like you were making it more difficult to explain. Beginners have no idea what you're talking about. I think you need to organize the content before speaking. Please make Colab names match the curriculum names or maintain consistent formatting. These details falling short makes the lectures look even worse. Explanations should fully acknowledge that others are beginners and be tailored to their perspective, but this isn't even good for review. In my view, it's too fast and chaotic for beginners - you'd probably need to go through it about 3 times. The current lectures are honestly just you explaining things alone, with a structure where students must read and understand on their own, and memorize by themselves. You said not to worry because you repeat things multiple times, but the more I listen, the more worried I become. Wait, I don't understand anything and the lecture is over? Should I watch the lecture again? Continuing to listen is tiring and makes me sleepy, and when will I memorize? It just creates complicated feelings. I think the reason is the explanation method + details. You explain with method A, then switch to method B, explain point 1, then additionally explain point 2... Could you please explain step by step in order? You should reorganize the flow of how to explain things in your head before filming. Try explaining like this... Main concept explanation - Basic code and basic results - Problem explanation - Code applied to the problem - e.g.) One-hot encoding is used in these situations, done like this. - The basic code looks like this and means this. The results come out like this. - So, with this actual data and this problem? - The code I just explained would change like this. (Explain the changed code parts) - Since I said one-hot encoding does this, the code results would come out like this, right? - Looking at these parts, you can see how, why, and what changed due to this. Do you understand what I mean...? I usually don't bother writing reviews like this and just move on. But I'm really frustrated. Other people will purchase this later too, and I hope they don't waste their money. I'm also writing this long review because I feel bad. If you see this review and still think it's just one person's opinion, that you explain well, and you're too busy to handle minor details, etc. That would be exactly what bothers me. Please take a few of your videos and review them again. Consider whether someone who knows nothing could understand this immediately, organize it in their head, and follow along well when listening to this.

    • roadmap
      Instructor

      Thank you for the feedback. I'll refer to the points you mentioned and work on improving in a better direction while keeping the lecture time from getting longer!

roadmap's other courses

Check out other courses by the instructor!

Similar courses

Explore other courses in the same field!

25% off for new members

$73.50

25%

$93.50