inflearn logo

Review Criteria for Developers Who Don’t Blindly Trust AI-Generated Code

I made it quickly with AI, so why isn’t the work finished? In seven short lessons, we’ll use case studies to examine the goals, evidence, and remaining risks to check when adopting, modifying, or holding off on AI-generated results. This is a free introductory course for developers who have used AI coding tools to establish a starting point for review. You can take the course without any separate assignments or submissions.

14 learners are taking this course

Level Beginner

Course period Unlimited

AI
AI
AI
AI
Thumbnail

What you will gain after the course

  • Criteria for distinguishing AI’s claims from actually verified evidence and explaining what additional conditions need to be checked

  • How to Assess Objectives, Verification Scope, and Remaining Risks When Adopting, Modifying, Deferring, or Rejecting AI Results

I built it quickly with AI, but
why isn’t the work finished?

Review criteria for developers who don't blindly trust AI-generated code

Free · 7 lessons · 28 minutes 48 seconds total · Subtitles included


The code was generated quickly. The explanation sounds plausible, and the tests have passed.
But when you try to apply it to the project, there is still more to verify and fix.

Which results should you trust, and what should you verify yourself?
This course is an introduction for developers that examines, through short examples, the goals, evidence, remaining risks, and next actions needed when developing with AI.


After receiving the result,
ask these three questions.

01. What are we trying to do?

First, define the goal and constraints of the task, as well as the criteria for accepting the result. Before focusing on what the AI created, confirm the problem we were trying to solve.

02. How far have we verified?

Distinguish between the AI’s explanation and the results actually observed. If the test passed, examine what conditions were verified and what has not yet been verified.

03. What should we do now?

Learn why you should decide whether to adopt, modify, defer, or reject the result. Connect the evidence you have verified and the remaining risks to your next action.


If you have these concerns, take a look at this together.

  • Developers who implement faster but spend more time reviewing and reworking
    Those who want to distinguish between the volume of generated output and actual project progress

  • Developers unsure how much to trust AI's answers
    Those who want to distinguish plausible claims from evidence they have verified themselves

  • Developers who want to decide what to entrust to AI and what to judge themselves
    Those who want to explain during code reviews why they accepted or modified a result


A curriculum followed through seven questions

  1. How has AI changed developers’ work?
    How do generation speed and project productivity differ?

  2. New problems created by more output
    Why do more results still require verification and integration?

  3. How to avoid becoming a messenger for AI
    When presenting results, what purpose, rationale, and risks should you explain?

  4. What developers must decide themselves
    What goals, constraints, adoption criteria, and responsibilities should be defined before delegating work to AI?

  5. How to make evidence-based judgments
    How do you distinguish between claims, observations, evidence, predictions, and unknowns?

  6. What to delegate to AI and what people should review
    What criteria should we use to decide what to delegate and what to review first?

  7. How to turn good answers into good decisions
    How do you explain the reasons for adopting, modifying, deferring, or rejecting them?


Take a moment to review, and think about your own work.

Each lesson follows a relatable situation → explanation of examples and decision criteria → summary of the direction for resolving it. Since the course covers review criteria that are not limited to any specific AI product, you can think about the tools and tasks you use as you go through it.

Things to Know Before Taking the Course.

  • Difficulty: This is an introductory course for developers using AI. It is helpful to have experience asking AI to perform development tasks and a basic understanding of the meaning of requirements, testing, and code reviews.

  • Course contents: Seven videos with subtitles, totaling 28 minutes and 48 seconds.

  • Format: The course primarily consists of watching videos, with no required assignments or submissions. No supplementary materials are provided.

  • Scope covered: This course explains the criteria for reviewing AI results and deciding what to do next. It does not cover installing specific tools, prompt syntax, or hands-on app development.


When you receive the following AI response,
so you can establish a starting point for making a judgment.

What you are trying to do, how far you have checked, and what to do next.
We will explore these together in seven short lessons.

Recommended for
these people

Who is this course right for?

  • Developers who implement faster with AI coding tools but never finish their work because of reviews and rework

  • A developer unsure how much to trust AI-generated code and test results, and what to verify personally

Need to know before starting?

  • It would be good to have experience requesting tasks from AI coding tools and a basic understanding of the meaning of requirements, tests, and code reviews.

Hello
This is sensaengkim247

Career Verified

132

Learners

7

Reviews

4.7

Rating

2

Courses

Hello.

I enjoy learning on my own and sharing what I have experienced,

I am Seunggyeom Kim, a developer who loves programming.

Current) Woowa Brothers - Backend Developer Former) JobKorea - Platform Architecture Former) 11st - Backend Developer Former) WeMakePrice - Backend Developer

  • Current) Woowa Bros - Backend Developer

  • Ex) JobKorea - Platform Architecture

  • Ex) 11st - Backend Developer

  • Former) WeMakePrice - Backend Developer

I am Seunggyeom Kim, a developer. Current) Woowa Bros - Backend Developer Former) JobKorea - Platform Architecture Former) 11st - Backend Developer Former) WeMakePrice - Backend Developer

I am Seunggyeom Kim, a developer. Current) Woowa Bros - Backend Developer Former) JobKorea - Platform Architecture Former) 11st - Backend Developer Former) WeMakePrice - Backend Developer

More
Published: 
Last updated: 

Reviews

Not enough reviews.
Please write a valuable review that helps everyone!

Similar courses

Explore other courses in the same field!

Free