･
Review 1
･
Average rating 2.0
There is a lack of overall explanation of the lecture content. You mentioned that the short lecture time is an advantage, but you moved through the material so quickly without even a brief explanation of the packages used, making it very difficult for someone new to mobile development to follow along. Throughout the entire lecture, I felt like I was just transcribing the instructor's flashy coding show rather than actually learning something. Of course, the completed app from the practice session is very polished and the code is clean, but that's because of the instructor's excellent skills. If a student were to develop such an app on their own, the content explained in this lecture alone would not be sufficient. This lecture seems suitable for those who have prior knowledge of mobile development and want to quickly go through the entire practical development process from start to finish. If you don't have mobile development experience, I think you should give it more thought before enrolling.
Hello, Yejoo Jung. In hands-on courses focused on building something, if you just follow along with the lecture without pausing, without thinking about why things work this way, and just type as-is, I think any course can feel like a coding show. You mentioned that there wasn't even a simple explanation of the packages used in the course, but I find this somewhat difficult to understand. Which packages had no explanation at all? When using react hook form, I explain what problems existed when implementing it directly before, what it solves, and what methods are available when using it. Also, when introducing tanstack query, in the [Login Integration with ReactQuery] lesson, I explain what the package is, what features it has, and when to use them. Even for toast messages, I explain what toast messages are, what problems exist with the existing RN component, what role this package plays, and how to use it. I'm not sure which part you're referring to when you say there wasn't even a simple explanation of the packages. Nevertheless, if you felt that the depth or pace of the explanations wasn't sufficient, I will reconsider this aspect from a course design perspective.
