Hello 100and, thank you for leaving such a detailed review. First and foremost, I am so sorry that the lecture I created seems to have disappointed you, 100and. I had hoped to receive a good review given how much effort I put into preparing it, but I feel this review makes me realize my own shortcomings. 😭😭 First, I think it's appropriate for me to explain my values. First, I also started studying development as a non-major, and from this perspective, I began preparing the lectures. My study method also leads me to believe that grammar isn't particularly important because there are so many references available to utilize. Rather than grammar, I wanted to explain based on how to use various tools and content used in practical work. That's why when you go to an actual interview, they don't ask about grammar. While I can't definitively say I'm an expert in interviews, I can certainly say that in all the interviews I've experienced at various companies, there were 100% no questions asking about grammar. Secondly, you mentioned 'gaslighting'. In a way, I think it's possible you might feel that way. My value when I first started the lectures was to provide a large framework. As someone who has experienced bootcamps, I thought this learning method was very effective. That's why in the lectures, I often say that since these parts exist, it would be good if you learn them independently. While it might differ by company and team, a company is truly a cold and ruthless place. Therefore, I didn't want to spoon-feed you and explain things. As you pointed out in your feedback, you're right. I will give you the same answer: you must learn by contemplating on your own and implementing things directly. Because it's an environment where no one will absolutely help you. I don't think I'll change in this regard. It seems that many of my lectures are tailored to my personal style, as they incorporate the way I first studied and my values. That's why I believe I failed to satisfy you, 100and.. 😭 I don't know what lectures I will create in the future. Nevertheless, I intend to proceed based on the topics, content, and concepts that I consider valuable. Since making lectures is already enjoyable for me. Thank you so much for taking the time to give such heartfelt feedback. It has been a great help. Have a good day and stay healthy!! Thank you!

I've also watched quite a few of this sharer's lectures... Honestly, I find myself empathizing more with the lecturer. If you actually work at a company, there are more malicious people than Kind ones. - There are people who yell and curse at work.. It seems unreasonable to just expect kindness. You called it gaslighting. I actually think the speaker is more realistic. So I believe they're telling the reality, not gaslighting. And while some students might find it strange, I think these words are far more helpful for surviving in reality. Lectures are, after all, meant to aid your learning, not for you to become dependent on them, which I believe is incorrect. I wonder if this is how the lecturer approached it. I feel like I've commented a bit presumptuously... Personally, I feel a bit sad, and living as a father entering my 40s, I just rambled on a bit out of boredom while walking down the street.

Thank you for your comments, but I feel the point has been missed, so I'd like to add my opinion. Of course, self-study is necessary. I'm also not asking for a hand-holding type of class. Moreover, simply 'Why don't you teach grammar!?' isn't my complaint..!! I don't know why you brought up interviews. The main point of my general dissatisfaction with Hong's lecture is the provision of content that doesn't match the lecture description. For example, Hong's lecture, 'Building a Chat Platform with Spring Boot,' from its title to its description, focuses on implementing a 'chat platform.' I also purchased the lecture expecting that, but many students have raised similar complaints due to the lack of a comprehensive explanation of WebSockets in that lecture. You responded that you focused on the core when creating the lecture, but if the core isn't WebSockets in a lecture promoted with an emphasis on WebSockets, then what is it..? For students who pay for lectures, they can only rely on a few preview lectures and the instructor's course introduction to make a purchase, and refunds are not easy because it's intangible property. In such a situation, I believe the instructor should provide an objective introduction to the lecture, but since that doesn't happen, dissatisfaction has accumulated. Here, I'd also like to add why I used the word 'gaslighting.' Reviews expressing dissatisfaction because the content advertised by the instructor wasn't delivered invariably receive responses like 'I want to help them create their own study methods.' Do students leave such reviews because they lack self-study methods or the will to learn? There are many points to study, so we pay money and invest time and effort to acquire as much knowledge as possible from a skilled instructor for the parts introduced in the lecture. To present this as an issue of willpower or cold reality is, I think, a significant leap in logic. Also, connecting yelling and bullying at work with lecture evaluations is a bit... While not the main point of my opinion, if I must explain, as a purchaser who paid for the lecture, I expect kindness from the seller, not from someone I'll work with. Furthermore, I wasn't even asking for kindness; I'm simply requesting a lecture that delivers at least what was advertised. I just wanted to take the lecture I expected; I'm not trying to experience some unknown malicious person or cold reality through you, Hong.