Well. It just reads the code that was already written, line by line... It felt like reading a textbook in school. I felt that way while watching the free lectures before this, but since it was a free lecture, I thought that it would be different from the free lectures, so I paid for it. To conclude, I was very disappointed, and the lecture that I chose after much deliberation was not very helpful, so I am skeptical about my judgment. Since I paid for it, I watched it all the way through, but if I had known that it would be like this, I would have watched a different lecture. The detailed explanation was very lacking, and when writing the code, it felt like I was just following along, so there was no explanation, so I had no choice but to infer from the function name and run it myself to figure out how it was done. In particular, when touching the options inside the Unity engine, they just set them up without saying anything, so when I looked at them one by one and did the same thing, I didn't know what they were, and I only thought, "How can I use this later if I set it up like this?" It seems like you're only touching the same options, but if it's an option that you use frequently, wouldn't it be good if you gave additional explanations on what that option is and what happens when you select a different option? Since there are so many options, I don't think you'll have to click on them to get used to them. Since it's a paid lecture, you should have explained it in more detail. Honestly, it's a shame that it's a lecture that I paid for. Many lectures that are free on YouTube mention what option you're currently selecting. If you have some knowledge of C# and the Unity Engine, you'll understand it right away and follow along, but if you're already at that level, isn't it a waste of money? I have two thoughts at the same time.