inflearn logo

(Powered up for 2027!) Pass the Information Processing Engineer Practical Exam in Just One Week

Pass the Engineer Information Processing Practical Exam on your first try! We’ll pinpoint only the essential code and theory you need to know. Master past exam questions completely! Open the door to success with systematic lectures. 🏆 2024 Inflearn Rookie Newcomer Award 🏆 2025 Learners’ Pick Award

(4.8) 749 reviews

5,752 learners

Level Beginner

Course period Unlimited

Python
Python
Java
Java
C
C
Engineer Information Processing
Engineer Information Processing
Industrial Engineer Information Processing
Industrial Engineer Information Processing
Python
Python
Java
Java
C
C
Engineer Information Processing
Engineer Information Processing
Industrial Engineer Information Processing
Industrial Engineer Information Processing

Reviews from Early Learners

4.8

5.0

ggj557

61% enrolled

I was short on time, so I only listened to the programming parts of lectures 2-6 and the 2023-2025 past exam solutions before taking the test, but thanks to that, I was able to get more than half of the programming problems correct. These days, pointer problems seem to come out as double pointer problems, but since I don't really get to the later lectures, I think it would be good if the earlier lecture parts also had a higher proportion of double pointers and structures! I could handle C and Java reasonably well, but I was completely ignorant about Python, and this time when I saw set, I remembered that it has no order, so thanks to that I was able to get it right. Besides this, inheritance was explained well, so I could get that correct too. It was quite helpful, thank you.

5.0

최요한

83% enrolled

25th year, 2nd attempt, I passed with a total score of 75 points, which was higher than my preliminary score. Actually, including this exam, I attempted a total of 7 times. 23rd year Information Processing Industrial Engineer 2nd and 3rd attempts. Since I was already doing it, I decided to take a more difficult and higher-level engineer exam instead of the industrial engineer exam, and in 24th year 1st, 2nd, and 3rd attempts, I failed spectacularly.. Moreover, in the 2nd attempt I got 50 points, and in the 3rd attempt, it was "entity integrity" but I wrote "object integrity" and failed with 55 points, which is a painful memory.. I really knew it but made a mistake and failed, so it was even more frustrating, and because of that disappointment, I couldn't get over the regret for a whole week. Now, thinking about how to prepare, I remember posting a complaint to you, teacher, sharing my concerns. In the community, there were many opinions saying that you need to study algorithms to pass, but teacher, you gave me comforting advice that if you have good fundamentals, you can interpret code line by line without necessarily studying algorithms, and that really paid off as I passed the 25th year 2nd attempt just like that!😊 The 1st attempt exam suddenly jumped up in difficulty, which was very confusing, but based on that exam difficulty, I was able to safely finish preparing for the 2nd attempt while listening to your lectures, and I got two code problems wrong - Python and Java lambda (I studied lambda but didn't review enough for it to be completely clear in my head😢😢) - and was finally able to escape after the 7th attempt!😢😢 Anyway, teacher! Thank you so much. As a working person, I didn't have much time, and for 2 years I was stuck studying for exams, working, and exercising busy days, but thanks to you I escaped. Especially this time, the theory part mostly came from your textbook😆😆😆(index, SYN Flooding, Proxy, etc.) And for those reading this review, there must be long-term test takers among you, but even someone with a thick head like me passed after multiple attempts, so don't feel deprived about being a long-term taker and just keep going silently until you succeed, trusting the teacher! The people who will be in the top 20% in the next exam will be you. Well then, I'll visit from time to time when I think of it. To study your new lectures, teacher~~!!😊

5.0

박준수

92% enrolled

I'm someone who usually doesn't leave reviews like this, but I'm leaving one now. After seeing the extremely vast practical exam book, I felt like giving up. While feeling that way, I happened to see Weekend Coding's lecture. It told me what to discard and emphasized what was important, which made studying really great. I passed with 63 points, and I'm happy that I don't have to look at that dreadful code anymore. I have a related major, I invested 2 weeks, and I only did a few mock tests, but I passed. You can do it too. Good luck!

What you will gain after the course

  • You can trace C, Java, and Python code problems line by line to determine the output.

  • Let’s solve the 12 past exam sessions from the 3rd session of 2022 through the 2nd session of 2026, along with explanations.

  • Master commonly misunderstood concepts such as pointers, inheritance, and upcasting.

  • Prepare the theory as well using the 190-page comprehensive theory book and the 54-page key memorization notes.

  • Prepare for unfamiliar code with modified past exam questions and five mock exams.

Recommended for
these people

Who is this course right for?

  • Those who have lost points on coding problems and failed the practical exam.

  • A non-major who passed the written exam but is seeing code for the first time

  • Those who are less proficient in one of C, Java, or Python

  • A working professional who wants to finish quickly with lectures and PDFs, without a textbook

Need to know before starting?

  • No prior knowledge is required! Even non-majors can pass.

Hello
This is weekendcode

Inflearn Verified

Career Verified

6,470

Learners

809

Reviews

1,422

Answers

4.8

Rating

4

Courses

🏆 Winner of Inflearn’s 2024 Rookie Award and 2025 Student Pick Award

👨‍💻 Inflearn Outstanding Course Review Instructor · Former developer with 10 years of experience on macOS

 

Hello. I run a YouTube channel called @weekendcode.

I am an instructor who strives to explain things as easily as possible for students without a computer science background and those interested in programming.

 

I graduated from university with a degree in computer science and earned a master’s degree in the field of human-computer interaction.

I worked as an Android developer using Java and served as a Python instructor.

 

Through several job changes and starting a business, I had the opportunity to share knowledge with people from non-technical backgrounds, and since then,

I am now actively working as a knowledge sharer.

 

Please feel free to ask questions actively about anything you don’t know.

I’ll do my best to answer.

 

Have a great day.

 

More

Curriculum

All

125 lectures ∙ (35hr 34min)

Course Materials:

Lecture resources
Published: 
Last updated: 

Reviews

All

749 reviews

4.8

749 reviews

  • ppatabox님의 프로필 이미지
    ppatabox

    Reviews 8

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    100% enrolled

    2024 Although I failed the practical exam in the end. It was a good lecture. The practical exam was much harder than I thought. There weren't many simple code problems... sigh... These days, Jeongcheogi... Just... What... What do you want me to do? Are they just trying to weed out non-majors? It was too hard... I have to try next year... Do I have to buy another lecture...

    • I'm also a non-major. I failed the practical exam three times and am retaking the written exam. Hang in there. The lectures are so great, so I wonder why people fail—including myself -_-

  • qofu92015766님의 프로필 이미지
    qofu92015766

    Reviews 3

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    22% enrolled

    Wow... After listening to all the programming parts and revising them, I solved the past exam questions, and it was so easy to approach that I got them all right... Thank you so much!!

    • weekendcode
      Instructor

      Thank you for the kind words.

  • kchs05296873님의 프로필 이미지
    kchs05296873

    Reviews 1

    ∙

    Average Rating 5.0

    5

    86% enrolled

    Watch this lecture = Virtually enter the exam room with 50 points secured

    • ghkd11183558님의 프로필 이미지
      ghkd11183558

      Reviews 1

      ∙

      Average Rating 3.0

      3

      52% enrolled

      This is a difficult lecture for non-majors. Most of the written exams are taken without studying programming languages in depth, so if you just watch the lecture videos like this, you won't know which parts to take notes on... It's also difficult to review without a textbook. Also, since only the lecture content is shown in the video, it feels a bit distracting. They draw a lot of underlines and arrows, but the excessive animation effects are quite tiring. I think I'll have to watch the entire lecture quickly once and then watch it again to follow along. The curriculum flow isn't drawn as a whole, and the previous and next lectures aren't well connected. They say there are no separate printouts for the example problems, but it would be nice if you could print out the key contents of the lecture screen so that you can review them. Whether you're studying on your own or through other lectures, it would be good for organizing in a short period of time if you watch it while studying for practical skills. In summary, This is a good lecture for those who have been exposed to programming languages through notes or other lectures to learn in a short period of time. This is a difficult lecture for non-majors who haven't been exposed to the meaning of functions and variables. + This is a review after listening to the lectures up to the past questions. I recommend this as a final lecture to those who have taken other information processing practical lectures. It is too difficult to prepare for the practical exam with just this lecture. Since it is a lecture where you can only see the board online, it is difficult to follow the flow of the solution because the board is written in every blank space on the screen. I also have no idea how to solve the code in the exam room. If you say, “If you just look at it, it will show the divisor and the sum, right?”, beginners will have no idea at all because they have not encountered many problems. I think it would be better to listen to other books or lectures at least once and finish with this lecture. If you listen to other instructors’ videos and Inflearn preview videos on the same topic on YouTube, you will be able to know which introductory lecture is better. It is true that I lack study. That is why I listen to the lecture, the introductory lecture. As a non-major but a student who is preparing to acquire it for related work, I wanted to share my review with a small number of students who are similar to me.

      • weekendcode
        Instructor

        Thanks for the feedback! I'll work on getting the output to the full course soon :)

      • Points I relate to: 1. They lure in non-majors for business, but the lectures are not actually helpful for non-majors. 2. The flow between lectures is not smooth. 3. The provided materials/handouts are poor. 4. Even after taking the course, I have no idea how to solve the problems when I get to the exam site.

    • eewefffa님의 프로필 이미지
      eewefffa

      Reviews 1

      ∙

      Average Rating 1.0

      1

      31% enrolled

      This is a lecture that is overrated. In particular, there are many explanations like 'This is a problem to find **, so the answer is obviously this, right?' and it feels like looking at an answer sheet without explanation. (I understood it because I had a base before, but if I were a beginner, I don't think I would have understood the code progression order at all with that kind of explanation.) Please think about it once more before purchasing the lecture, and although I didn't feel it before, this was an opportunity to feel that the quality of Sina*'s free lectures is quite high, so please refer to it for other test takers.

      • weekendcode
        Instructor

        Thanks for the feedback! I will review the entire lecture to see if there are any parts that I missed. If there is anything you don't understand, please feel free to ask questions.😊

    weekendcode's other courses

    Check out other courses by the instructor!

    Similar courses

    Explore other courses in the same field!

    $68.20