I've taken all the Basic lectures and about 70% of the Intermediate, but I personally have a lot of regrets about the lecture. I already had some experience with React, so I took the lecture, but the code is lacking in terms of React. It's been a few years since Facebook emphasized functional components instead of class-type components, but the lecture proceeds with class-type components. They do cover Redux, but they do asynchronous processing directly in the action creator function without middleware. It's not that you can't do that, but it seems like it's common to use middleware, so I wonder if it was too much to expect them to use redux-thunk since it's a simple asynchronous processing. And React native already officially supports it, so even if it's not the latest version, it's already in the official documentation, but I feel like they're not prepared enough to process it using a library with only two-digit downloads per week. It's something that's already stated in the lecture introduction, but even if you ask a question, you can't get an answer. It is advertised that using react native cli instead of expo is advantageous, but I couldn't tell from the lecture what the advantages are. It may have been covered by the 30% that I haven't heard yet. Even though it's an intermediate course, it's a very basic course, so I wonder if it's really that different from using expo. In the introduction of the knowledge sharer, you said that you mainly did image processing and then tried app development as a hobby before recording the lecture. I don't think that's a problem at all, but from the students' perspective, they're paying a lot of money and spending more precious time to listen to the lecture with a heavy heart, so I think they should have prepared more thoroughly.