I used to think that I had to explain my experiences quantitatively by including numbers, but after taking this lecture, I realized that such an approach can end up looking like a mere performance report. It should have been obvious to consider who is reading it first, but I reflected a lot on how I had been writing my resume mechanically until now. When I considered that document reviewers are also busy developers with their own primary tasks, I realized for the first time that they have no choice but to quickly judge an applicant's appeal while skimming resumes in short bursts between work. I truly felt that removing experiences is more difficult and more important than adding many of them. Based on Gemini's actual experiences, I was able to get a sense of what the reviewer's perspective is like, and thanks to that, I had many thoughts while looking over my resume again. It was a lecture that made me think more deeply on my own because you provided a sense of direction rather than just a "correct answer." Thank you.