If only the drawbacks were improved, a unique course on '전자정부프레임워크'. Pros 1. The only course covering the '전자정부프레임워크' For those encountering or studying it for the first time, it's the only option. This alone is a big advantage of this course. 2. Teaches how to catch fish (i.e., how to figure things out) It shows you how to navigate through the code to see how classes are implemented. 3. Tries to teach many things During the lecture, it teaches more than just one topic, adding several others, allowing you to build more knowledge. 4. Lectures while viewing PPTs and code together. Since the self-prepared PPT materials and code are provided, you can easily identify keywords for learning, and learn how to actually write code together. 5. Subtitles provided Convenience provided with Korean subtitles. Cons 1. The only course covering the '전자정부프레임워크' Because it's the only course, having to overcome and endure all the drawbacks below is quite stressful. 2. Teaching how to catch fish is good, but... Most of the time, explanations are given only in the manner of "~ If you go in here, everything is explained." One of the reasons we take courses is to learn the content efficiently, but because there's no explanation for the code used to follow the flow of the lecture content, you have to stop and look up the implementation or functions of the classes mentioned in the lecture one by one again. 3. Trying to include too much, the content goes off-topic. If it's a lecture covering topic A, it should be a lecture for topic A, but it keeps suddenly bringing in topics B, C, D, getting jumbled up, and confusing what's actually for A. It requires immense concentration.. You'd know how often it strays from the topic if you counted how many times the phrase "Returning to the main point" is used. It would be better to include only the content necessary for topic A and organize the rest into a different course. 4. Lectures only with PPTs and code. Because it just reads the code literally, I often had to search again using keywords from the provided materials and learn the principles and theories from external sources again. Even the parts explaining theory feel strongly like just reading textbook-like content rather than explaining principles. For example, instead of "add an annotation to connect it," it would be good to have an explanation of how it's connected. 5. What's the point of providing subtitles...? Due to ambiguous expressions, it's hard to understand what's being said just by looking at the subtitles. Ambiguous expressions like "such," "these kinds of things," "like this," "here," "like me," "earlier," etc., are used too often. Even if you're concentrating on the video lecture, the moment you lose track of where the tiny mouse pointer is going, you have to rewind the video 20 seconds to find what "here" refers to.