First of all, I apologize for the inconvenience. I am in the process of revising the lecture notes and videos, so if you could let me know which parts are messed up and which codes are out of sync, I would appreciate it. I will re-upload the part that I left in a reply to another course review for the part that you follow along with. "This lecture is not designed for blindly following along (as I explained in the video on the pros and cons of clone coding). If it were, the lecture time would have been over 30 hours because I would have shown you all the codes one by one. The trick to taking this lecture is to try clone coding yourself first and use the code in this lecture as an answer sheet. Or, you can just watch the lecture first and then try to create it yourself based on what you learned. The purpose of this lecture is to enable you to create a site like x.com without following the code."

The codes for lectures 1, 2, and 3 are all uploaded (a total of 8 codes, including the middle code for each lecture, are uploaded to GitHub), but I'm not sure what you mean.

Hello. I checked what's uploaded to GitHub. It's uploaded in large chunks by session. If not, it would be better if it's uploaded in small units, such as 1st lecture, code for 1st lecture and 2nd lecture, code for 2nd lecture. When I say the lecture order is messed up, I mean, I do A, then B, then A is wrong, so I have to edit the code for A again. This happens too often. The problem with this is that I have to take all the lectures. Even if I take the lectures, I want to choose the parts I want to see, I think it would be good if I could see it smoothly. And it would be good if there were visual materials as well. It's not just cut editing, but explaining it with words. It would be good if you explained it with visual materials. Personally, I've looked through the official documents once in a while, and the official documents are much easier to read and well organized.. I feel like the lectures are not organized at all. I'm studying next at my company, and only Zerocho has the next14 version, so I watched it. If I hadn't watched it at my company, I think I would have only watched up to the middle part of session 2 and not watched it....

I have re-uploaded the lecture codes, one lecture at a time. You can find the GitHub links for each code in the lecture notes. You mentioned that you were working on 'a' and then had to modify 'a' again because 'b' went wrong. Basically, the content of each lecture video should be executable once the video is finished. However, when adding a new feature 'b', you might have to modify the existing code 'a'. This isn't because the lecture content is disorganized, but rather an inevitable aspect of programming lectures. Visual materials are collected and organized in the lecture materials (GitHub README.md). Lecture notes compiled by students will also be uploaded soon. Also, I mentioned at the beginning of the lectures, in sections 1 and 2, not to type along with the code but to copy and paste it. Of course, it's up to you whether you want to type along or watch the lectures in your own style. I won't be producing lectures where you simply type along anymore. I believe that just typing out the code from the lecture, one letter at a time, without trying to create it yourself first, is the same as copying and pasting, which is meaningless (this is just my personal opinion). It seems like my lecture style doesn't match this approach, which is something I can't help.